Introduction
As a part of
Stuart’s Get Ready for Work placement at Apprenticeships in Scotland, he was
asked to look at the different types of apprenticeship models and find out more
out about them. He has done this and summarised them in the report. Stuart
found it interesting to look at the mainland European models where they are
really popular and supported, the model looks to spread further.
Standard
Model
The first
model is where the employer decides to take on an apprentice to come into their
workplace. The apprentice is employed by the employer where they work and learn
on the job. The employer works with the training provider who provides the
apprentice’s framework. The training provider reviews the apprentice’s progress
and accesses it against the learning outcomes towards a vocational
qualification. This model is the most commonly used across the UK and is used
by apprenticeships in Scotland.
In Germany nearly two thirds of school kids undertake apprenticeships. A quarter of employers provide apprenticeships. The German model emphasises a combination of theoretical training in the classroom and hands-on experience in the work place. This dual system where apprentices are structured training by the employer alongside the general and vocational education they receive. Training plans are different for different sectors but always deliver after close consultation between the employer, educators and government. The programme is drawing admiring glances because of Germany’s strong economy and its low youth unemployment. Meanwhile young people in the west are coming out of university with debt and dim job prospects. In Germany, finding employment without having completed an apprenticeship is almost impossible. One reason this model is so successful is that it has a school system to support it. Although this system is great there is little point in other countries following the model if there is no commercial demand for the skill being taught. For the apprenticeship to work for the young people, the businesses, committed to planning future products and investment into the workforce.
Apprenticeship Training Agencies
This model is great for small
employers as the use apprenticeship training agencies (ATA) to host the apprenticeship.
What the ATA does is source the apprentice and acts as the apprentice’s
employer. The employer who is hosting the apprentice pays the ATA for the
apprentice’s services. Reasons why a small employer would use an ATA are:
- They can not commit to the frame work
- Short-term restrictions on employee numbers
- Unsure about apprenticeships
- Find the right apprentice for the employer
- They are responsibile for the wages, tax, national insurance, administration and performance management
- Supervision of the apprentice
- Provide links with training providers
- Support to employers and apprentices
Group Training Associations
Group training associations (GTAs)
were set up to train on behalf of employers. A GTA is a training organisation
governed by the employers who are subscripted to the group. Through
collaborative membership they share knowledge, develop processes and systems of
mutual benefit. GTAs were set up in response to common difficulties in
attracting and training young people. They were original were small groups of
firms in the same industry and in the same local area. GTA membership tends to
be geographically specific and largely based on delivery of apprenticeships. A
key difference between GTAs and other providers is that GTAs have membership.
Having member is said to add accountability, immediate feedback and a sense of
ownership over the GTA.
Swiss Apprenticeships
Switzerland has one of the most
successful apprenticeship systems in the world. The country regularly tops the
result tables in international skills competitions. In Switzerland the
unemployment rate of 7.5% compared to the United Kingdom’s 21.9%. In
Switzerland apprenticeships are valued and successful route to take. In the UK
the university education is widely seen as the only legit path to Professional
careers, this is not the case in Switzerland. Around two thirds of young people
do apprenticeships compared to 6% here. The Swiss model combines 3 days in the
work place and 2 at vocational college. A big fear for employers in the UK in
regards to apprenticeships is that the young person may leave at end and take
all the skills they’ve enquired with them. However in Switzerland a
standardised approach to training means all apprentices acquire similar skills
and expertise, which means employers are more relaxed about the idea. Another
difference is that in Swiss apprenticeships are generally seen as traineeship
that may or may not lead job whereas here the National Apprenticeship Service
stresses that an apprenticeship should be a job, and not a course or
qualification. In Switzerland there is a collective responsibility felt by
employers, educators and learners for the success of apprenticeships.
German ApprenticeshipsIn Germany nearly two thirds of school kids undertake apprenticeships. A quarter of employers provide apprenticeships. The German model emphasises a combination of theoretical training in the classroom and hands-on experience in the work place. This dual system where apprentices are structured training by the employer alongside the general and vocational education they receive. Training plans are different for different sectors but always deliver after close consultation between the employer, educators and government. The programme is drawing admiring glances because of Germany’s strong economy and its low youth unemployment. Meanwhile young people in the west are coming out of university with debt and dim job prospects. In Germany, finding employment without having completed an apprenticeship is almost impossible. One reason this model is so successful is that it has a school system to support it. Although this system is great there is little point in other countries following the model if there is no commercial demand for the skill being taught. For the apprenticeship to work for the young people, the businesses, committed to planning future products and investment into the workforce.
No comments:
Post a Comment